A lot of our work happens in relationship with philanthropic partners, so we have invested a lot of time reading and considering new visions for and critiques of philanthropy in books like Winners Take All, Decolonizing Wealth, or publications like Leading with 100 Year Vision. When Edgar Villanueva referred to the Dismantling Racism workbook in his book Decolonizing Wealth, it got me thinking about how colonized mindsets show up in evaluation. Specifically, Villanueva writes, “In their Dismantling Racism workbook, Kenneth Jones and Tema Okun identified other characteristics of white supremacy culture, including perfectionism, sense of urgency, defensiveness, quantity over quality, worship of the written word, paternalism, either/or thinking, fear of open conflict, individualism, worship of unlimited growth, objectivity, and avoidance over discomfort.” These characteristics seemed familiar in the context of my experiences around evaluation. I thought of many ways we as evaluators are (un)consciously operating under these norms to the detriment of our evaluations with our partners, and I started to think through some strategies to consciously and proactively dismantle tendencies towards white supremacy culture. Below is our team’s initial thinking about what a colonized mindset versus a decolonized mindset looks like in evaluation.
Other: Use systematic processes to collect data that is most relevant and useful, and that acknowledges the value of alternative data collection methods and sources. Read more about how statisticians are cautioning against strong conclusions drawn from statistical significance. Our team will continue to share how we’re working across some of these pieces to dismantle a colonized mindset in evaluation. We plan to dive in more deeply through a series of blog posts. As your team uses these tools and investigates these issues, we want to hear from you so that we can continue to deepen and improve our own ability to implement successful and decolonized evaluation.